Matrix
|
Private
Cloud
|
Public
Cloud
|
Hybrid
Cloud
|
Security
|
Most
Secure as everything is on –premise
|
Good
but depend on the security measures considered by cloud service provider
|
Very
secure, integration capabilities add another layer of security
|
Reliability
|
High,
as everything on premise
|
Medium,
Depend on the Internet connectivity speed and cloud service provider
availability
|
Medium
to high as frequently accessed items are kept on premise but also depends on
Internet connection speed
|
Cost
|
Very
high, as enterprise need to invest in data center, cooling systems,
electricity, etc.
|
Low,
as follows Pay-per-use model
|
Moderate,
as allows to consume some resources from public cloud based on pay-per-use
|
Performance
|
Very
Good
|
Medium
|
Good,
as supports caching of frequently accessed items
|
Deployment Premise
|
On
Enterprise premise who want to use it
|
On
Cloud Service Provider’s Data Centers and App Servers
|
Partially
on enterprise premise and partial on third party public cloud
|
Customer Coverage
|
Single
customer specific
|
Can
be used by multiple customer at a time
|
Multi
customer support but still depend on the context of use case
|
Access Level
|
Private
|
Public
|
Partially
private and partially public
|
Maintenance
|
High
as everything on premise
|
No
maintenance
|
Required
only for the resources which are on premise
|
Flexibility
|
Low
|
Very
High
|
High
|
Examples
|
Government
agencies and research labs like NASA, etc.
|
Google,
Salesforce.com clouds, etc.
|
GoGrid
hybrid cloud installations, etc.
|
Friday, 27 December 2013
Comparison of 3 Main Cloud Computing Deployment Models
Location:
Pune, Maharashtra, India
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment